Cheap ethanol fuel?

Want to talk politics, religion, opinion, or Current events? go here.

Moderator: Officers

Cheap ethanol fuel?

Postby Bilnick » Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:14 pm

GM banking on a biofuel breakthrough

January 14, 2008



It sounds like a fevered dream of science: a fuel that costs less than $1 a gallon to create, made out of anything from wood chips to your kitchen trash, that takes little water or natural resources. And it's available in volumes large enough to ease some of America's thirst for oil within five years.

But an Illinois ethanol start-up says it has the technology to make such fuels a reality today -- and General Motors Corp. says it's the real deal.

At the North American International Auto Show in Detroit on Sunday, GM unveiled a deal with Coskata Inc., saying it would take an undisclosed stake in the firm and help develop its ethanol process. Coskata plans to have its first ethanol plant running by the end of the year, with GM as its first customer.

Coskata executives say they'll break ground on a full-scale plant later this year and have it running by 2011, generating 100 million gallons of ethanol annually.

"This is a speed to market play," said Bill Roe, Coskata's CEO. "It's ready today, and we are moving rapidly toward commercialization."

Coskata's technology involves a unique mix of old chemistry and new science to tackle the hurdles biofuels face to becoming a true substitute for fossil fuels. Experts say that if Coskata's projections hold up -- goals which federal researchers didn't expect ethanol companies to meet before 2015 at the earliest -- the company has made a historic breakthrough.

"It would be an incredible story if it's true," said Kevin Book, an energy industry analyst with Friedman Billings Ramsey in Alexandria, Va. "This hits on the sweet spots."

GM Chairman Rick Wagoner said Sunday at the auto show that while the company was committed to hybrids, fuel cells and other oil-saving technologies, they would not be produced in enough volume to reduce oil demand for at least a decade. Wagoner said if all flex-fuel vehicles built by Detroit were burning ethanol in 2012, the nation would reduce its oil demand by 18%.

"Nothing else we can do gets even close to that kind of impact that soon," he said.

A golden opportunity

With oil prices hovering near $100 a barrel and gas prices expected to rise above $3.50 a gallon later this year, biofuel companies would seem to have a golden opportunity for growth. But to date, biofuels have been driven by government incentives and mandates rather than consumer demand, and 2007 exposed the limits of current technology.

While the ethanol industry hit a record output of 6.2 billion gallons, it also faced its first political backlash. Ranchers blamed the industry for boosting the price of corn to record levels and driving up food costs. Activists in many cities fought new or expanding plants over environmental concerns such as water use, air pollution and safety.

And despite pressure from Detroit automakers and the ethanol industry, growth in filling stations for E85 fuel remained sluggish: Roughly 1,400 stations out of about 170,000 nationwide offer it. The Detroit automakers have pledged to make half of their new vehicles E85 capable by 2012, but foreign automakers haven't followed suit, successfully lobbying Congress to drop a proposal that would have forced them to make similar changes.

The energy bill President George W. Bush signed last month reflects those politics. It sets a new target for ethanol production of 36 billion gallons by 2022 -- but requires that 21 billion gallons come from sources other than corn. A host of start-up firms has been chasing ways to make liquid fuels using cellulosic sources -- basically plant matter, from jungle grasses to orange peels -- and new technologies.

But none of those systems is considered commercially feasible today.

Robert Wallace, an engineer who analyzes biofuel production for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colo., said next-generation ethanol firms face a variety of hurdles, from uncertain costs of raw materials to unproven methods that might be too costly at large volumes. He said several companies had made claims about their technology, but none had proven fully viable yet.

"You can have all the pieces to a car, but it doesn't mean you have a car," Wallace said. New companies that have small demonstration plants under construction "have to get all the bugs out of running a plant that size before investors start investing."

Bacteria at work

Coskata is a tiny firm of about 35 people in Warrensville, a suburb of Chicago. Founded in 2006, the company was funded by several venture capitalists who have focused on ethanol and other new energy sources, including tech billionaire Vinod Khosla.

Its process is built around synthesis gas, or syngas, a mix of carbon monoxide and hydrogen emitted when plants, wood or other carbon-containing materials are broken down at high temperatures. That type of gas has been used for centuries as an energy source -- it powered gas streetlights in many cities -- before natural gas became widely available.

The real trick at Coskata comes from bacteria, specifically, five varieties the company calls its "thoroughbreds." Found by researchers from Oklahoma and Oklahoma State universities in muck in a waste lagoon, the bacteria naturally generate ethanol and similar chemicals from syngas.

The bacteria are grown on a series of straws as thin as a human hair, made from a filter fabric. The gas flows through the inside of the straws, while water is pumped along the outside, and the straws allow the bacteria access to both. The bugs convert the syngas to ethanol, keeping a little for themselves to reproduce, and the water carries the fuel away.

Coskata engineers say their bacteria are about 90% efficient at converting gas -- a rate that leapfrogs the firm over its competitors. While it's impossible to determine what the price would be at the pump, the final product would cost less than $1 per gallon to produce, about half that of gasoline, including the capital costs of building a full-scale plant. The system can convert 1 ton of raw material into more than 100 gallons of ethanol, while competing firms struggle to get 70 gallons a ton. The U.S. Department of Energy doesn't expect the industry to hit 100 gallons before 2020.

The process has several other benefits. While corn ethanol plants use roughly 4 gallons of water for every gallon of ethanol, Coskata uses less than a gallon of water. The E85 fuel derived from Coskata's ethanol releases 84% less carbon than a gallon of gasoline. And because its filters are held in large plastic cylinders, the company believes it can easily scale its system to 100 million gallons a year or more.

Coskata plans to have a 40,000-gallon-a-year pilot plant open by the end of the year, with the first fuel powering vehicles at GM's proving ground in Milford. Before the end of the year, Coskata also plans to break ground on a full-size 100-million-gallon plant that it wants to open by 2010. Locations for both plants have not been determined.

Contact JUSTIN HYDE at 202-906-8204 or
User avatar
Posts: 5494
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 3:32 pm
Location: Saline, Michigan

Re: Cheap ethanol fuel?

Postby Aithzar » Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:23 pm

Interesting article. They definitely look to be way ahead of the competition in this area. Guess we will need to wait and see if their word holds up in the next couple years. I like how their projections blew away DoE estimates in this field.

User avatar
Posts: 1178
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:50 am
Location: Huntsville
Highscores: 2

Re: Cheap ethanol fuel?

Postby dkofklove » Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:01 am

ethanol has always been relatvly simple to make, the problem is how to make it without harming the enviroment. Current bulk production generaly utilises the classic yeast fermentation processes. This requires water, food source usualy maze type products for industrial purposes, and yeast. by products of production rather alot of C02, a solid waste which can be used as animal feed, ethanol, and heat. Sadly this method has one very large flaw, the food source. To get enough cheap maze etc guess what the companies have been doing, thats right buying from south america, where shock and horror they are hacking down the rain forrests to plant the damn maize. Thats right folks to help global warming along use bio ethanol destroy a rain forrest etc. It does not need to be this way but thats the profit margin for you. Intresting article above if it is viable andd efficent would actualy use up waste materials. I can see 2 flaws:- 1) wood chips are mentioned as source, for large scale production this would become limiting and enviromentaly detremental as cheap sources of would would be sought out (waves another rain forrest goodbye). 2) what is the energy requirment to create this gas?? hydrogen production alone would involve massive amounts of power. Would this energy use be significantly off set by the energy production from the ethanol.
If waste fuels only were used such as house hold bio waste etc this process would become by the looks of it very usefull as both waste treatemnt process and a fuel production so all in all it looks arther good as long as wood chips are not the main source of the gas.
User avatar
Posts: 295
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: uk

Return to Real Life and Opinion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest